Ya I was just hinting that we should come up with a standard place to
put the instance data tree, which might mean a slight alteration of
the standard tree too... but I'm not really sure, just wanted to put
it out there.
--jason
On Jan 27, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I think in order to allow multiple instances to work off of the
>> same installation effectively we need to have a tiered repository
>> support, so that each instance could include a shared read-only
>> repository (the system repository), and then a read-write
>> repository (instance repository), where artifact resolution would
>> first check the instance repo, then the system repo.
>>
>> If we do want to start supporting this, I suggest we also revisit
>> the basic server's file structure, as we will need to insert a
>> hierarchy for the instance data.
>>
>> --jason
>
>
> IWhat if we started somthing in var like:
>
> ./var/servers/server.n
>
> The server.n sould be some arbitrary name that users would identify
> the names of the server instance. We would look in the instance
> tree first and if something wasn't found we'd look in the main
> tree. Is that what you meant?
>
>
|