geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Release geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec
Date Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:21:11 GMT

On Jan 2, 2007, at 5:19 PM, David Blevins wrote:

> Hey All, back and catching up.
>
> As I mentioned in the first specs vote that I proposed "I've done  
> the work to fix some of our spec jars so they are compliant and  
> would like us to start releasing them and removing snapshot  
> references from our builds."  I've since started abbreviating that  
> to "Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release" as the  
> changes the changes are pretty much N iterations of added/removed/ 
> updated a (or many) constructor/method/annotation.
>
> Anyway, I was half inclined to put links to the related commits in  
> the vote threads as the diffs are the only real way to describe  
> several API tweaks, but just didn't pull the trigger on that idea.   
> Wish I had.
>
> Here's that info now:
>
> Changes to Annotations 1.0
>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=489255
>
> Changes to EJB 3.0
>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=489258
>
> Changes to EJB 3.0 Persistence (JPA)
>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=489260
>
> EJB 3.0 Interceptors and JTA 1.1 were fine hence the description of  
> "Verified and compliant and ready for release" in their release  
> threads.  I haven't yet had the chance to verify any other specs  
> for compliance.

The jacc-1.1 spec has a significant amount of functionality in the  
permission classes so it needs more than just signature verification  
before we release it.

thanks
david jencks

>
> Happy New Year!
>
> -David
>


Mime
View raw message