On Jan 27, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I have made the binaries from Geronimo 2.0-M2 available for review
>> at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M2-rc1
>>
>> In this directory you will find the various assemblies for your
>> review as well as one massive tar ball that has the various
>> artifacts that will ultimately be distributed.
>>
>> The files are being uploaded as this is being written so give them
>> some time.
>>
>> Also included in this vote are the artifacts for the JACC spec 1.0-
>> M2 which is required for 2.0-M2.
>>
>> Remember...this is a milestone and not a full release.
>>
>> Thanks for David Blevins for being quite the helper tonight in
>> getting the Release Notes in line and helping out with Open EJB.
>
> As Prasad has noted in a separate thread, EJB@ injection for Jetty
> is not working. Matt can confirm, but I believe that he
> intentionally did not merge the latest changes from trunk into the
> M2 branch. A release manager needs to draw the line somewhere, and
> this allowed him to get the RC candidate built. I was (and still
> am) fine with delivering M2 with this limitation. We've got a lot
> of great function, here. I'm looking forward to getting on to
> making more great progress like this.
>
> I suggest we update the release notes to reflect this EJB@
> limitation. Something like:
>
> - EJB 3.0 (via OpenEJB project)
> Supported:
> ...
> - @EJB injection of ejb-refs and ejb-local-refs (Tomcat)
> ...
>
> Limitations:
> - No support for MDBs.
> - @EJB injection of ejb-refs and ejb-local-refs (Jetty)
>
> I've tested both jee5 assemblies. The source and binary look good.
> With an update to the release notes, I'm +1.
+1 to the release.
And for the release notes we should make a new section for Servlets
2.5 and mention the @EJB Jetty limitation there.
-David
|