geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vams...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Date Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:18:31 GMT
+1

--vamsi


On 1/12/07, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -dain
>
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
> > FYI, we are currently including this in lib/* and 12 modules
> > reference it in their poms.
> >
> > I think we should remove these refs.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> Do we need to include qname anymore?  Looks like that is part of
> >> se 5 now...
> >>
> >> Anyone know?
> >>
> >> --jason
>
>

Mime
View raw message