geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Release geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec
Date Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:22:56 GMT

On Jan 2, 2007, at 3:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:

>
> On Jan 2, 2007, at 5:19 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> Hey All, back and catching up.
>>
>> As I mentioned in the first specs vote that I proposed "I've done  
>> the work to fix some of our spec jars so they are compliant and  
>> would like us to start releasing them and removing snapshot  
>> references from our builds."  I've since started abbreviating that  
>> to "Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release" as the  
>> changes the changes are pretty much N iterations of added/removed/ 
>> updated a (or many) constructor/method/annotation.
>>
>> Anyway, I was half inclined to put links to the related commits in  
>> the vote threads as the diffs are the only real way to describe  
>> several API tweaks, but just didn't pull the trigger on that  
>> idea.  Wish I had.
>>
>> Here's that info now:
>>
>> Changes to Annotations 1.0
>>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=489255
>>
>> Changes to EJB 3.0
>>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=489258
>>
>> Changes to EJB 3.0 Persistence (JPA)
>>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=489260
>>
>> EJB 3.0 Interceptors and JTA 1.1 were fine hence the description  
>> of "Verified and compliant and ready for release" in their release  
>> threads.  I haven't yet had the chance to verify any other specs  
>> for compliance.
>
> The jacc-1.1 spec has a significant amount of functionality in the  
> permission classes so it needs more than just signature  
> verification before we release it.

Definitely.

-David




Mime
View raw message