Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender;
        b=aiw1jzxflAxy1s5CouC7mfV49tNmhEWdlwQiVJIe+tjPlaO0nycKf50MK/cK+pTpcDhpsftTne57OZrQ3yxBWmjRDgwkbHwFXpp/JOYjmxj/Y2iBHM45vfqLbEeQ2VUuYZPb20Qm5W3Bwtz+KQUMC7IqItL4h2Vs5bQE7RXCx40=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <45749B98.6020104@gmail.com>
References: <45743468.4020609@gmail.com>
 <543394D2-FEA9-4D63-9316-06BA7584E391@planet57.com>
 <45746ED2.6020001@gmail.com>
 <AC70F589-0E79-4083-A912-7257EB296EF5@planet57.com>
 <097D8F6A-D6CA-4366-82BB-06491177E8CF@gmail.com> <45749B98.6020104@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <C6B83990-6207-4A53-BE0D-3B465A017DA5@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Subject: Re: SNAPSHOT - Revision #
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:13:32 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

I think this is kinda dangerous...

For example, what if you had that property to make it look like the  
1.2 final release and then the UI was actually changed.  You now have  
confused users wondering why the 1.2 shot on the website is different  
from the final.

And what happens when 1.2.1 is release?  Need to make all new screen  
shots?

I think its a waste of time.

--jason


On Dec 4, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:

> yup, that's pretty much my point. Not that the reader wont be able  
> to understand the doc if the screenshots look different from the  
> final release. But it will make the content more clear, more  
> representative of the release covered.
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>> Why does it matter?
>>>
>>> If the final release for a given screen is the same as the snap,  
>>> then why bother updating it?
>> I think Hernan wants to generate screenshots which will look like  
>> the actual 1.2 release. The current screenshots must contain "1.2- 
>> SNAPSHOT" or "1.2-rxxx" for artifact names. This seems like a  
>> pretty reasonable request, to me...
>> --kevan