Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20583 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2006 15:57:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2006 15:57:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 80045 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 15:57:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80011 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2006 15:57:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80000 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2006 15:57:54 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:57:54 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:57:41 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so877498nfc for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:57:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=jVqPxfmpsMWkU4rRxuKdooU3KFkCjjEyQQ/FCz9lDVngIIlC/OEwUMxePG/NwEwJXsKEnGOtISCN6V7Vak3/vwKIvQCFuSQm9hhPR2fQgju03HNqc9txCFkMF7gDLp+FD66O3SYoP6rpq8VMrghQBFbHVUbQXogg0Ch22DFVzR8= Received: by 10.82.172.15 with SMTP id u15mr82756bue.1165507039389; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:57:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?9.27.41.210? ( [129.33.49.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24sm1124774wrl.2006.12.07.07.57.18; Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:57:18 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: <20061206195215.2C98D1A984A@eris.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <797445A1-62A2-4E40-B7A7-1CE4A77C5707@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kevan Miller Subject: Re: svn commit: r483201 [1/2] - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-framework/ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/ applications/demo/ applications/geronimo-ca-helper/ applications/geronimo-examples/geronimo-jsp-exam... Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:57:15 -0500 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:11 PM, David Jencks wrote: > I'm not sure who I've talked to about this or where but I think > really really strongly that we should include the major version > number of the projects we integrate in our artifactIds relating to > those external projects. > > A couple people have pointed out that something like jetty_6 or > geronimo-jetty6-builder is more consistent with our spec naming > than jetty6 or geronimo-jetty6-naming. > I don't really care about that, although I think the shorter > tomcat6 is perfectly clear and easier to type. > > Other stuff: > axis >> axis1 > cxf >> cxf1 > openjpa >> openjpa1 > > I think this will really reduce confusion about what is running in > a server. > > So, I'd like the tomcat modules to be renamed geronimo-tomcat6, > geronimo-tomcat6-builder, tomcat6, tomcat6-deployer. > > Can we discuss and settle this soon? Not sure I feel quite as strongly as you.. but I'm giving it a try... ;-) So, any module written explicitly for an external project (i.e. non- Geronimo) would have the external project's major version number encoded in it's name? But not minor number? So, activemq, wadi, would be added to your above list? Heh. How about geronimo-jetty-clustering-wadi? ;-) geronimo-jetty5-clustering- wadi2? --kevan