Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35611 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2006 22:05:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2006 22:05:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 96996 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2006 22:05:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96954 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2006 22:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96943 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2006 22:05:46 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:46 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of hcunico@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.234 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.234] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:34 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so3607029wxc for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZP0jZuMFFk5a6CUcBDK+UQWE+9+G6OAqmftuRE8KHYytPiHj4YriZm+qx0wM+2aUJvaVmePaNOtCWRBkiSJkpmYfE4boVn48Kx2noc8Ixc5MWpSrDTdGjYxKU8lt5xCtnuEzR6vthV0ZeV2T08iBX1ultP++XCbFma6rTmdayaE= Received: by 10.70.61.1 with SMTP id j1mr16048138wxa.1165269913015; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.103? ( [24.163.84.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h35sm37609283wxd.2006.12.04.14.05.12; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45749B98.6020104@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:05:12 -0500 From: Hernan Cunico User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: SNAPSHOT - Revision # References: <45743468.4020609@gmail.com> <543394D2-FEA9-4D63-9316-06BA7584E391@planet57.com> <45746ED2.6020001@gmail.com> <097D8F6A-D6CA-4366-82BB-06491177E8CF@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <097D8F6A-D6CA-4366-82BB-06491177E8CF@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org yup, that's pretty much my point. Not that the reader wont be able to understand the doc if the screenshots look different from the final release. But it will make the content more clear, more representative of the release covered. Cheers! Hernan Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > >> Why does it matter? >> >> If the final release for a given screen is the same as the snap, then >> why bother updating it? > > I think Hernan wants to generate screenshots which will look like the > actual 1.2 release. The current screenshots must contain "1.2-SNAPSHOT" > or "1.2-rxxx" for artifact names. This seems like a pretty reasonable > request, to me... > > --kevan >