Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-43666-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 80169 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2006 04:24:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Dec 2006 04:24:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 66333 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2006 04:24:51 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66277 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2006 04:24:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 66266 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2006 04:24:51 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:24:51 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.5 required=10.0
	tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of c1vamsi1c@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.182.187] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.187)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:24:41 -0800
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so5040882nfc
        for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:24:20 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=VQHfqihYjhOqaKAcKntNCJQ7vfCN9ztKz/+tVbXe8IqMu6/fK1uJz5uQ8xKJ7c0exozAmuh6CHZzN4eR6Abi8csLz5ui1EnfVWz9gpXZbC7c1xkdrU0CP4IKl8uKLodOpOm1KRcbng9K9i3vRSeSlRQ6M5uonBZr34pY1XcsNH4=
Received: by 10.48.242.19 with SMTP id p19mr17550655nfh.1167279860300;
        Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.11.12 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Dec 2006 20:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <22d56c4d0612272024k25bf80fp4a79fa88ead61c62@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:54:20 +0530
From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com>
To: Dev-list <dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Subject: purpose of branches\1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_128379_28306578.1167279860270"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_128379_28306578.1167279860270
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

What is the purpose of branches\1.2 as it stands now?  Can fixes targeted
for "1.x" be committed to this branch?  If not, where should this ffixes
go?  Can fixes for JIRAs marked as "Improvement" be still committed to
branches\1.2 and designated as fixed in "1.2"?

--vamsi

------=_Part_128379_28306578.1167279860270
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

What is the purpose of branches\1.2 as it stands now?&nbsp; Can fixes
targeted for &quot;1.x&quot; be committed to this branch?&nbsp; If not, where
should this ffixes go?&nbsp; Can fixes for JIRAs marked as
&quot;Improvement&quot; be still committed to branches\1.2 and designated as
fixed in &quot;1.2&quot;?<br>
<br>
--vamsi<br>

------=_Part_128379_28306578.1167279860270--