Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-43545-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7476 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2006 14:11:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2006 14:11:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 68111 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2006 14:11:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68074 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2006 14:11:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68063 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2006 14:11:56 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:11:56 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0
	tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of c1vamsi1c@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.182.187] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.187)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:11:46 -0800
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so2864623nfc
        for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:11:24 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=E0yHTsG6ixjAi2VXs7b2J7uhROG1URVOTQANLcOEujof/2vKcO2yOHc8TzhGJg2jw4RSXtjSxM/PwpWS5UfmjfMXGc2Paczscikesyl8AbpSuNCCcKxbveENqnBJa6eKx46KFt5vFI0ECVjBtQ8wDsB6LLoespmA6VDZzOxKTUY=
Received: by 10.49.93.4 with SMTP id v4mr7840386nfl.1166710284842;
        Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.11.12 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <22d56c4d0612210611q1a2c3251n6f4839c8c5d66186@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:41:24 +0530
From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0
In-Reply-To: <ED48F503-3B82-41B6-81C5-749AB41BBB12@hogstrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_52534_2558241.1166710284799"
References: <00EA6A4E-0459-4503-AFD3-0BFC4ACE4372@visi.com>
	 <ED48F503-3B82-41B6-81C5-749AB41BBB12@hogstrom.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_52534_2558241.1166710284799
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Matt has got a point.  Voting on an svn branch is new.

--vamsi

On 12/21/06, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I understand this vote.  BAsed on passed precedent we
> generally vote on a set of binaries and not a source tree.  I think
> Dain offered to own releasing specs so will he be producing a set of
> binaries to vote on?  Voting on an SVN branch is a new twist for me :)
>
> I'm happy to vote that someone produce the elements to release.  Did
> I miss an e-mail?
>
> On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:55 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> > Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release.
> >
> >  Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> > branches/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0
> >
> > I hereby propose we release this branch as final.
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
>

------=_Part_52534_2558241.1166710284799
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Matt has got a point.&nbsp; Voting on an svn branch is new.<br>
<br>
--vamsi<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/21/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matt Hogstrom</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:matt@hogstrom.org">matt@hogstrom.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I&#39;m not sure I understand this vote.&nbsp;&nbsp;BAsed on passed precedent we<br>generally vote on a set of binaries and not a source tree.&nbsp;&nbsp;I think<br>Dain offered to own releasing specs so will he be producing a set of<br>binaries to vote on?&nbsp;&nbsp;Voting on an SVN branch is a new twist for me :)
<br><br>I&#39;m happy to vote that someone produce the elements to release.&nbsp;&nbsp;Did<br>I miss an e-mail?<br><br>On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:55 AM, David Blevins wrote:<br><br>&gt; Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release.
<br>&gt;<br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;Release Branch: <a href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/">https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/</a><br>&gt; branches/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I hereby propose we release this branch as final.
<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Here&#39;s my +1<br>&gt;<br>&gt; -David<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br><br>Matt Hogstrom<br><a href="mailto:matt@hogstrom.org">matt@hogstrom.org</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_52534_2558241.1166710284799--