Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1716 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2006 22:03:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Dec 2006 22:03:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 8563 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2006 22:03:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8520 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2006 22:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8509 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2006 22:03:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:32 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so1429414nfc for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=h+AJCQmRg2aXNFsMHZ7d91Lamq9rbwUfcARmT4Tfv/n3y8mGTx40eXeUQXC8RXi0nKBujurucKOlFF872wQeY3FLH1MG5t5mJXkU2GYJv6OCpUsGlzOA3Vg2dS/a1W7w0R+f46eTWevPEhL0Ot87Cr+sW2crd65lFC/n0/uL4po= Received: by 10.78.193.5 with SMTP id q5mr1216175huf.1166306590789; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.3? ( [24.7.69.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 35sm5697092huc.2006.12.16.14.03.09; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:10 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <17830E64-BAEA-44B9-9332-04EE43E174E4@iq80.com> References: <59FAE15A-6064-468B-A8EA-DDEB7FD80B8E@planet57.com> <56C5CC1B-49C8-4E5B-B5E4-2437F58AAD65@maven.org> <17830E64-BAEA-44B9-9332-04EE43E174E4@iq80.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <00168232-9EC4-4D57-83E7-01FD6C2ACA4E@planet57.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: no more modules for specs... Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:03:21 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: Jason Dillon X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'm sorry I did not have the luxury of waiting... this all blew up in my face, effectivly blocking me from progress which had verbally committed to being finished with. Now I have to come up with another solution... or simple stop working on this. * * * I wish I could have convinced you (and others) that this versioning scheme was going to cause problems... before it actually caused them. But it is clear that any further talk about the versioning was going to get us no where. --jason On Dec 16, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > I wish you had just waited a day while we stabilized after I > released 32 projects (or 5 if you don't want to count the specs > individually). I am going to be merging everything to the staging > repo into the release dir. > > After the merge we will not have the SNAPSHOT mess that created > this problem in the first place. I only hope we use this as a > learning experience and do not use SNAPSHOTS so readily. > > -dain > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > >> I agree and disagree... but I 'm gonna shut up. >> >> I think you guys are moving in positive direction with mvn... >> >> i'm just pissed off that the recent changes to specs has derailed >> my automation efforts. >> >> I certainly did not mean for this email to turn into a mvn ranting >> session. >> >> and maybe tomorrow I can cope better with this and provide a >> reasonable response to this email. >> >> I appreciate the work you guys have been doing... and while not >> perfect, IMO it is positive direction. >> >> and I will leave it at that for now. >> >> thanks for your time... sorry if I ruffled some feathers. >> >