geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0 M1 Content
Date Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:50:37 GMT
On Dec 5, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Should we use M<N>
> ------------------
> Jason posted in another thread about how M<n> (I assume you were  
> referring to Milestones) might be confusing for post 1.0 releases.   
> I don't think its confusing as it represents a simple point in time  
> reference of a work in progress but not a full implementation (I  
> think that build would more appropriately be a beta).  Alpha  
> release might be appropriate but I'm good with milestone.  Other  
> thoughts?

We have a history of using M1 syntax for releases and see no reason  
to change that.

> Content
> -------
> At this point M1 would contain:
>
> Java 1.5 as the base JDK
> Tomcat and Jetty for Servlet 2.5, JSP 2.1 and Debugging support.
> JTA 1.1
> JSF (depending on where the MyFaces folks are at)
> JSTL (I think Joe was working on this)
>
> Once we get this together and we can run Daytrader 2.0-SNAPSHOT on  
> it I think we have a content ready milestone.

We already have JPA but it is so cool we should mention it again :)

> Timeline
> --------
> This is less important than the content.  I suggested 12/22 since  
> its the Friday before the Christmas holiday.  Personally it would  
> feel good to know we packaged up something and finished it this  
> year towards 2.0.  There is a lot of small stuff we already have  
> thats almost done.  We've been discussing release early and often  
> so the date is more of an artificial stake in the sand.  If we  
> don't get the work done then we don't ship.  It largely depends on  
> completing what goes into M1 rather than the date.

+1 Lets get'er done

-dain

Mime
View raw message