geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sachin Patel <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] G 2.0 M1 Content
Date Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:34:13 GMT
I don't see the confusion at all, as long as the M<n> is preceded by  
the final release version (ex. geronimo-2.0-M1).

On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Should we use M<N>
> ------------------
> Jason posted in another thread about how M<n> (I assume you were  
> referring to Milestones) might be confusing for post 1.0 releases.   
> I don't think its confusing as it represents a simple point in time  
> reference of a work in progress but not a full implementation (I  
> think that build would more appropriately be a beta).  Alpha  
> release might be appropriate but I'm good with milestone.  Other  
> thoughts?


View raw message