geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From anita kulshreshtha <a_kuls...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r483201 [1/2] - in /geronimo/server/trunk: applications/console/geronimo-console-framework/ applications/console/geronimo-console-standard/ applications/demo/ applications/geronimo-ca-helper/ applications/geronimo-examples/geronimo-js
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:56:36 GMT
No problem.. It was late at night. My commit failed because something
was not up-to-date. So I did svn update without checking the commit
messages. The tomcat and tomcat-builder modules were gone! We must
remember that everyone does not have access to commit messages.

Thanks
Anita

--- Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:

> My apologies, I had thought that the discussion on dev plus mail from
> scm would be sufficient notification but I could have also sent a
> heads-up notice.  I also didn't realize svn could lose your local
> changes from an update -- usually it automatically merges them or
> marks a conflict and saves your files.  I hope there is a way to
> recover your lost changes.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Paul
> 
> On 12/11/06, anita kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >    It would be nice if before renaming/moving directories, a note
> > announcing the change could be sent to the list. This will give
> people
> > a chance to rename their local copies and avoid getting them wiped
> out
> > by an svn update.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > --- Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > FYI -- the following artifactIds are now renamed to use
> "tomcat6".
> > >   org.apache.geronimo.configs/tomcat6
> > >   org.apache.geronimo.configs/tomcat6-deployer
> > >   org.apache.geronimo.modules/geronimo-tomcat6
> > >   org.apache.geronimo.modules/geronimo-tomcat6-builder
> > >   org.apache.geronimo.assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-jee5
> > >   org.apache.geronimo.assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal
> > >
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/6/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure who I've talked to about this or where but I think
> > > > really really strongly that we should include the major version
> > > > number of the projects we integrate in our artifactIds relating
> to
> > > > those external projects.
> > > >
> > > > A couple people have pointed out that something like jetty_6 or
> > > > geronimo-jetty6-builder is more consistent with our spec naming
> > > than
> > > > jetty6 or geronimo-jetty6-naming.
> > > > I don't really care about that, although I think the shorter
> > > tomcat6
> > > > is perfectly clear and easier to type.
> > > >
> > > > Other stuff:
> > > > axis >> axis1
> > > > cxf >> cxf1
> > > > openjpa >> openjpa1
> > > >
> > > > I think this will really reduce confusion about what is running
> in
> > > a
> > > > server.
> > > >
> > > > So, I'd like the tomcat modules to be renamed geronimo-tomcat6,
> > > > geronimo-tomcat6-builder, tomcat6, tomcat6-deployer.
> > > >
> > > > Can we discuss and settle this soon?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > david jencks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ps. I'm planning to remove the jetty[5] stuff from trunk soon.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> >
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

Mime
View raw message