geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [vote] Release geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0
Date Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:21:26 GMT
I think David is treating the branch as somewhat official and is
bringing the community into it...nothing wrong with a healthy vote.

I suggest we head off what looks like may be turning into a "bike shed"
thread. ;-)

Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> Matt has got a point.  Voting on an svn branch is new.
> 
> --vamsi
> 
> On 12/21/06, *Matt Hogstrom* <matt@hogstrom.org
> <mailto:matt@hogstrom.org>> wrote:
> 
>     I'm not sure I understand this vote.  BAsed on passed precedent we
>     generally vote on a set of binaries and not a source tree.  I think
>     Dain offered to own releasing specs so will he be producing a set of
>     binaries to vote on?  Voting on an SVN branch is a new twist for me :)
> 
>     I'm happy to vote that someone produce the elements to release.  Did
>     I miss an e-mail?
> 
>     On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:55 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> 
>     > Fixed, verified to be compliant and ready for release.
>     >
>     >  Release Branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>     > branches/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.0
>     >
>     > I hereby propose we release this branch as final.
>     >
>     > Here's my +1
>     >
>     > -David
>     >
>     >
> 
>     Matt Hogstrom
>     matt@hogstrom.org <mailto:matt@hogstrom.org>
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message