geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <hcun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release 1.2-beta?
Date Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:51:23 GMT
Hi All,
>From what I tested so far I found two bugs, here are the JIRAs

GERONIMO-2612  	 NPE thrown in console when shutting down server
GERONIMO-2613  	 Some portlets in the console can't size correctly

Cheers!
Hernan

Hernan Cunico wrote:
> Hi All,
> I think I saw some discussion about this exception, anyways here is goes 
> (again!?).
> 
> I'm testing the Tomcat dist and get this  exception when I shutdown the 
> server
> 
> Server shutdown begun
> 15:33:32,625 WARN  [BasicLifecycleMonitor] Exception occured while 
> notifying listener
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding.removeBinding(GBeanBinding.java:159) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gjndi.binding.GBeanBinding$GBeanLifecycleListener.stopped(GBeanBinding.java:108)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.fireStoppedEvent(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:197)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor.access$500(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:41)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicLifecycleMonitor$RawLifecycleBroadcaster.fireStoppedEvent(BasicLifecycleMonitor.java:259)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.attemptFullStop(GBeanInstanceState.java:359)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstanceState.java:188)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.java:551) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.java:423) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstanceState.java:180)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.java:551) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.java:423) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstanceState.java:180)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.java:551) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.java:423) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.stop(GBeanInstanceState.java:180)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.stop(GBeanInstance.java:551) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.stopGBean(BasicKernel.java:423) 
> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.KernelConfigurationManager$ShutdownHook.run(KernelConfigurationManager.java:310)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.notifyShutdownHooks(BasicKernel.java:668)

> 
>        at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.shutdown(BasicKernel.java:645)
>        at org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon$1.run(Daemon.java:234)
> Server shutdown completed
> 
> BTW, there are two thread for the same purpose ( I think ), this is one 
> and the other is "Weekly: Geronimo 1.2-r480769". Where should we send 
> our comments?
> 
> Cheers!
> Hernan
> 
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> First off I'd like to give everyone a hearty "thank you" to everyone 
>> that has (already) worked on 1.2, so THANK YOU.
>>
>> Now that we have branched 1.2, I think we should get the code out to 
>> our users as soon as possible, and I think this means releasing an 
>> uncertified 1.2-beta.  This will allow us to work our any remaining 
>> kinks, legal issues and bugs, while the remaining TCK work is being 
>> completed.  With good luck, we should be able to get out a single beta 
>> and incorporate the feedback just as the TCK work is finished.
>>
>> So to kick things off, I have just published our regular Wednesday 
>> snapshot build here:
>>
>>    http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/unstable/1.2-r480769/
>>
>> Please, review this with an eye for a Release vote later this week.  
>> If you see a problem, let us know.  If you don't see any problems, let 
>> us know that also.
>>
>> When no release stopping problems exist, I'll create proposed final 
>> 1.2-beta assemblies and post them to my home directory for voting 
>> (hopefully later this week).
>>
>> Again, thank you,
>>
>> -dain
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message