geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Adopt a spec?
Date Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:06:36 GMT
I don't get it... why do we need an adopt a spec program?  I'm not  
really sure what it is... but it doesn't really sound good. :-\

--jason


On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:57 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:

>
> On Dec 21, 2006, at 1:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--vote--Release-geronimo- 
> jpa_3.0_spec-1.0-p8013384.html
>> I like voting on binaries for most our stuff as our build is
>> massively complex.  But in this case I figured I'd give the "do you
>> trust me to build/publish" angle a try as these are tiny little
>> jars that aren't complicated and it's way easier to just run the
>> maven publish command on them after the vote than it is to create a
>> "staging" build for each one and figuring out a non-trivial way to
>> publish them later.
>>
>     IMHO, specs are a perfect candidate for adopt a spec program. Any
> PMCer (committer?) gets to adopt one. And yes it does not get named
> after them ;-) It all comes down to trust.. WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com


Mime
View raw message