geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul McMahan" <paulmcma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MileStone 1 Release of Geronimo 2.0 Branch Notice
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:37:50 GMT
In order to make a release you have to touch several files, such as
bumping the versions from 2.0-SNAPSHOT to 2.0-M1 in the poms.  IIUC
that is all we need the branch for and can otherwise continue working
on trunk without porting changes back to the branch.

Best wishes,
Paul

On 12/11/06, Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another Q.
>
> If a branch is made, would the code there have to maintained ? Would
> bug fixes in 1.2 be rolled into the trunk as well as the M1 branch ? I
> hope not.
>
> I hope it is just for tagging purpose and the code there would not
> have to be maintained post M1 release.
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 12/11/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> > Why?  I don't see why we would want to make a branch just for 2.0-m1.
> >
> > SVN is not the best tool for working with many branches, so I would
> > recommend keeping the active branches to an absolute minimum.
> >
> > What happened to stabilizing 1.2 and getting that out?
> >
> > I think that if you want to make 2.0-m1, then just pick a time on
> > trunk when it looks good, then make the release and move on to the
> > next milestone.  IMO adding more branches here will just complicate
> > the matter way more than it needs to be for a pre-alpha release.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Being the overly optimistic one that I am I'd like to branch trunk
> > > tomorrow in the afternoon.  The goal of the branch is to stabilize
> > > a milestone release with the content previously discussed.
> > >
> > > So far it looks like we have:
> > >
> > > JSF,
> > > Java Mail
> > > Tomcat 6
> > > Jetty 6
> > > JSTL
> > > Java 1.5 ready
> > > and JPA
> > >
> > > I think Kevan is working on the specs which need to be completed
> > > for Geronimo 2.0 as well as 1.2.  OpenEJB will need to release as
> > > well so I'm hoping to have an answer on the DayTrader issues
> > > tonight or tomorrow.
> > >
> > > I'm currently working through some issues with DayTrader on 1.2
> > > which also apply to Geronimo 2.0.  My thiking is that people will
> > > continue to work on trunk (2.0) while the M1 release is cleaned and
> > > made ready.  I'll do the packaging and people can happily continue
> > > to hack away at trunk.
> > >
> > > Any major items missing?
> > >
> > > Matt Hogstrom
> > > matt@hogstrom.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message