geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jason.dil...@gmail.com
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release process change
Date Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:35:31 GMT
This is NOT how mvn works folks... I've been trying to explain that to you for the past weeks.
You just don get it :-/

Good luck

--jason


  

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:15:39 
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release process change


On Dec 22, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> On Dec 22, 2006, at 2:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> From what I understand, the problem you are focusing on
>> is just a naming problem: you want the GA release to be
>> named 2.0.  That's fine.  But it only concerns the final
>> downloadables archives, right ?

This is a good point.  For the assemblies, from a "marketing"  
standpoint, we can version them any way we want.

>
> Nope, since mvn releases each component's artifact separately, its  
> not just the zip/tgz that one traditionally thinks of as the  
> release... its every single artifact that gets spit out of the  
> release.

We should deal with the module versions separately from the  
assemblies.  I'll hop back on this next week...I'm taking a few days  
of R & R.

Cheers

Matt Hogstrom
matt@hogstrom.org


Mime
View raw message