Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.182.187 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=j/0tq2xmlLadd2JNTqQ7B+hku819d8/FyNGssdSvxnJoC/JqV7HDcRT1wYtadzsJrZzXKeeYVneWm9LKeLP6S7fvGVfdenwhfVd972skJbof69FdEJgChyGwEMIq1SaMwJxZCg3lK54501LfGI7/b06bJujUVwPVmCqZE1dYTPY=
Message-ID: <c278ac970611041331o1bbf547em9ec99fefab2622f8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 16:31:36 -0500
From: "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discussion] openejb-itests in testsuite
In-Reply-To: <FECB6897-6452-4A04-AB36-954699353E35@visi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c278ac970610231434ge8c4edfw73ff4e59d3fbda46@mail.gmail.com>
	 <50A5BD06-96A7-4993-A4B1-9A8EF9028FAC@visi.com>
	 <c278ac970610271426g4d52b1abr2b25ffa819291e42@mail.gmail.com>
	 <A4126B96-4F4B-4398-BA5D-368C89CE2FC2@visi.com>
	 <c278ac970610300751i499374ddsdb572b0fe66356c6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <32386304-C262-4B26-B18E-F84E265F7B6D@visi.com>
	 <c278ac970610311007m6ea370c4j5b822320bc3812a6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <27B19F01-B5CD-46C6-A2E0-8D798A3B1E32@visi.com>
	 <c278ac970611021830q3977fbf1nf7f9d6183bc0d935@mail.gmail.com>
	 <FECB6897-6452-4A04-AB36-954699353E35@visi.com>

David,

Can you please review and apply the patch here -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-302

Thanx
Prasad

On 11/3/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 2, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
> > OK. Sounds good. "o.a.openejb" it would be.
> >
> > The reasons I want to leave the tests in one single module are
> > manifold.
> >
> > 1) That is how they are today.
> > 2) To split them, it would have to be someone from openejb. I have no
> > idea how they are structured.
> > 3) My top priority now is to get the testsuite framework integrated
> > with the G build.
>
> That's fine.  We can do that part later.
>
> -David
>
>
> > Cheers
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 11/1/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 10/30/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Thanx. Please see comments inline -
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >> Couple thoughts on the poms:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>    - the parent would lineage would be
> >> >> org.apache.openejb:itests ->
> >> >> >> org.apache.openejb:openejb
> >> >> >>    - the groupId would be org.apache.openejb
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The groupId and the parent lineage looks good. As stated above,
> >> >> there
> >> >> > would be many child modules for the beans under the itests
> >> parent
> >> >> > module
> >> >> >
> >> >> > groupId: o.a.openejb
> >> >> > openejb -> itests -> itests-security-xxx
> >> >> > openejb -> itests -> itests-cmp2-xxx
> >> >>
> >> >> Exactly.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > After having built the itest beans as per our discussion above, the
> >> > contents of the openejb directory in m2 local repo  are -
> >> > ${settings.localRepository}/org/apache/openejb/
> >> >
> >> > itests-cmp2-cmrmapping
> >> > itests-cmp2-petstore
> >> > itests-cmp2-prefetch
> >> > itests-cmp2-storage
> >> > itests-itests-core
> >> > itests-security-001
> >> > itests-security-002
> >> > itests-security-003
> >> > openejb
> >> > openejb-builder
> >> > openejb-corba
> >> > openejb-corba-builder
> >> > openejb-core
> >> > openejb-itests
> >> > openejb-pkgen-builder
> >> > openejb-sunorb
> >> > openejb-yoko
> >> >
> >> > Does this look good ?  Or should we move the itests artifacts one
> >> > level down to groupId "o.a.openejb.itests" ?
> >>
> >> Let's keep it in o.a.openejb for now as that's the way it is in 3.x.
> >>
> >> > For now, I shall put all the tests into 1 artifact module. We
> >> should
> >> > look at breaking them and putting them with their respective bean
> >> > modules later on.
> >>
> >> What's the issue with doing that now?
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>