Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16666 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2006 14:41:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2006 14:41:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 86919 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2006 14:42:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86611 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2006 14:42:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 86600 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2006 14:42:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:42:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.208.196.171] (HELO outbound.mailhop.org) (63.208.196.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:41:50 -0800 Received: from bi01p1.nc.us.ibm.com ([129.33.49.251] helo=[9.37.214.138]) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1Gpn6O-0001YA-Cb for dev@geronimo.apache.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:41:28 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 129.33.49.251 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: hogndos Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <51375ACA-7B4D-4961-96AC-B86742968BB4@iq80.com> References: <51375ACA-7B4D-4961-96AC-B86742968BB4@iq80.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7BE0D4CE-7899-4F36-AE93-182A7B5F67F9@hogstrom.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Hogstrom Subject: Re: Release 1.2-beta? Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:41:27 -0500 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think the beta at this time makes sense. You indicated the "legal issues" below. What is still outstanding as I think they need to be enumerated for people that will be voting. On Nov 29, 2006, at 10:32 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > First off I'd like to give everyone a hearty "thank you" to > everyone that has (already) worked on 1.2, so THANK YOU. > > Now that we have branched 1.2, I think we should get the code out > to our users as soon as possible, and I think this means releasing > an uncertified 1.2-beta. This will allow us to work our any > remaining kinks, legal issues and bugs, while the remaining TCK > work is being completed. With good luck, we should be able to get > out a single beta and incorporate the feedback just as the TCK work > is finished. > > So to kick things off, I have just published our regular Wednesday > snapshot build here: > > http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/unstable/1.2-r480769/ > > Please, review this with an eye for a Release vote later this > week. If you see a problem, let us know. If you don't see any > problems, let us know that also. > > When no release stopping problems exist, I'll create proposed final > 1.2-beta assemblies and post them to my home directory for voting > (hopefully later this week). > > Again, thank you, > > -dain > Matt Hogstrom matt@hogstrom.org When the clouds are full they pour the rain out on the earth; and whether a tree falls to the north, or it falls to the south, wherever the tree falls, there is lies.