Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-41005-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 95989 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2006 23:49:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2006 23:49:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 303 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2006 23:49:45 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 99600 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2006 23:49:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 99589 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2006 23:49:42 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:49:42 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of jason.dillon@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender)
Received: from [66.249.92.169] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:49:28 -0800
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so1560203ugc
        for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:49:07 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender;
        b=eohMIX6MuHKQhH5qLJ0VDbagiskUuBMlKOKBjhgMkrg+wLf6ATF0xMJmYHjEDhxA0rR0soL6DZNZCadf5wvVSb1z3heipFmqn8AMAsX5z0V8Zm/xC04b6ee8W/PcQGwSizuBbIEx/ZbUE5qT/InGBNp+MMShHtmepxCKzLM+zJM=
Received: by 10.78.204.20 with SMTP id b20mr9000862hug.1162943346768;
        Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:49:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.0.1.3? ( [24.7.69.241])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 10sm7580051hug.2006.11.07.15.49.05;
        Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:49:06 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <9B5A842D-F317-4552-A1C6-1BE8C808D765@visi.com>
References: <ACB71196-4B44-4C5B-82D6-CA53E4C912BF@iq80.com>
 <9B5A842D-F317-4552-A1C6-1BE8C808D765@visi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <6FA0E588-1ADE-4068-A994-AE092C111752@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Subject: Re: Release most 1.4 specs?
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:49:06 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Nov 7, 2006, at 9:12 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Before we release them can we mark the deps of these specs with  
> "<scope>provided</scope>"?  Especially anything that's also in JEE  
> 5 that requires JTA and anything that requires QName.

I think its fine for the JavaEE5 specs, but not sure how builds might  
react to the change for others... but I have not really tried to see  
how G behaves.


> Also, some people are using them outside of Geronimo and have been  
> having 1.3 compatibility issues with our specs (like OpenJPA).  For  
> those that can compile with 1.3 can we mark them in the pom to  
> compile that way?

Sounds like a good idea.

--jason