Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40470 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 15:58:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 15:58:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 27262 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 15:58:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27215 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 15:58:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27204 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2006 15:58:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:58:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.226] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:58:20 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1642020wxd for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:57:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=ZYVrrllRRCqp0dsoBNCUmY86xrRCykBJM3sj6dVaSnoeRC7eUtPn8kGhdm9O9TepskQfZ2wL4LjGrw/7ENmRFFy7gkeM0/j6pod5Cu/Hl5YHjwpH28aslqs1RhUaqsP+RF85lNsziF+s8nTlQ9EeYpNDfDyyaw4mvOHO7UJhXZI= Received: by 10.90.29.2 with SMTP id c2mr3059756agc.1163001479556; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:57:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ( [66.57.98.165]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 11sm1865015wrl.2006.11.08.07.57.59; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:57:59 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: <7EFB2FA7-9DB7-4040-A4A5-D9FFE3D78A79@gmail.com> <4A68826C-493D-4F6C-9046-6B1DD0F37C2D@iq80.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <22B71B51-FB4B-4772-97D2-07CDE1B36930@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kevan Miller Subject: Re: Release most 1.4 specs? Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:58:01 -0500 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: > I think we need to release the reorganized/repom'd specs... that > was the general plan after cleaning them up was to make a release > so we have a set of consistent non-SNAPSHOT specs to work off of. > > After this re-release, we can debate one version, or whatever. I'd > still like to see one version win out, but I have yet to come up > with the smoking gun argument to convince everyone that I'm not on > crack. > > BUT... for now, we gotta move forward with something. Its easy > enough to change later if we want. I don't really understand why we can't resolve the versioning issue then release. I assume it's a timing issue. What is the current SNAPSHOT status of specs gating? I think we can certainly release before G 1.2 is ready to go... IMO, neither solution is going to be perfect. No matter what decision we reach, somebody will be able to say "I told you so". I'd prefer we go one way or the other and not look back... --kevan