Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4233 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2006 13:56:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2006 13:56:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 25032 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2006 13:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24995 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2006 13:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24984 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2006 13:56:31 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:56:31 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of paulmcmahan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.170] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:56:19 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so1831400ugc for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:55:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SVNUwgWho5O1O5oVve/5HPxIOuS2QzMjxPE1ss3MfN4po/23llh+5+iQkilLbK2250V1H+6XyvAHveTBLWTpxb+rcaOWbQwyeR/Uy0Mg14f6nTBuMoUUIySmkFlBp6xJtXcnQubDdAm1WFvJzGlG+LRTqUZy/vtiRzbMngrcKnk= Received: by 10.67.100.17 with SMTP id c17mr8128904ugm; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:55:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.19.8 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 05:55:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21df75940611010555m5db5ba98gcfc892ba98898a5d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:55:57 -0500 From: "Paul McMahan" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: 1.2 Fit and Finish In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One of the activities to coordinate when finalizing the release is updating the 1.2 plugin repository catalog at: http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins/geronimo-1.2/geronimo-plugins.xml to point at a repo where the 1.2 artifacts are published instead of the snapshot repo it currently points at. For testing purposes it would be ideal to build Geronimo as version "1.2" (not "1.2rc1" or "1.2.timestamp" or something like that) and publish the 1.2 artifacts to a maven2 repo during the release candidate cycle. That would allow us to test the plugin system in pretty much the exact state it will be when 1.2 is released. Is that feasible? If not then we may need to work out an alternate approach where the repository catalog gets updated after the release goes out and the artifacts get published. That makes me a little nervous though since it will be too late to make changes to the server if something doesn't work right. Best wishes, Paul On 10/30/06, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > In a typical Geronimo release we tend to spend a significant amount > of time in what I'll call the "Fit and Finish" phase. This involves > tying up loose ends such as log levels, tools L&F, startup times, > licenses and so on. Basically, the phase includes fixing all the > nits that cause people to vote -1 for a release (BTW no vetos in a > release vote). > > Please, take a moment and respond to this email with any items you > feel should be cleaned up before we release the software. That way > we can hopefully get these items out in the open and addressed while > we are finishing the TCK testing. Please note that just because an > item is mentioned doesn't mean it must be completed before a > release. The only thing required for a release it to successfully > pass a vote of the PMC, so if the item is critical to you, spend a > few minutes fixing it. > > With any luck we should be able to have the server ready to ship > about the same time we finish the TCK testing. > > -dain >