Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=W2fkIAAr/E+hnLWPH0Em8sV0xSFxTKQPYTcaBMvR4YZTXWaeXLv+YcbiiwGiXK/KD4WlLs+QbkMX1vGKZ+Yqz7ph4Yg0h9HZNRXC1Ow2mQeVKuol691PhkU/5GCZEeadq2mKBlaqS7nfyxJltf6DHlsfNMszfQaVKyDPoxYCXlY=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <675146.3668.qm@web31715.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <675146.3668.qm@web31715.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <0771F823-B8BE-4968-AF85-C53FA32C5181@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: tomcat v6 integration game plan (longish)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:19:40 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Nov 30, 2006, at 9:39 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:

>
> --- David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Thinking about this more I think we should perhaps rename the specs
>> configs "specs" without the j2ee-1.4 stuff in the name and start
>> putting the new specs into it.  I'm also starting to think that
>> keeping jetty5 around in 2.0 will just slow us down even if it isn't
>>
>    Just a fleeting idea.. Could we possibly use the specs-configs
> approach for the new things (JEE 1.5) and use the old way of doing
> things for 1.4 stuff. I know it needs more thought.... We should have
> at least one web container working all the time.

I certainly agree at least one web container should always be  
working :-).  I think jetty6 is working with new specs.... we just  
have to rearrange things a little bit, I think Joe is working on that.

I don't understand how we could have a hybrid approach in one  
branch.  If we left the 1.4 spec jars in the rmi-naming config and  
also gave it a parent config of the combined set of new jee5 specs  
and unconverted j2ee 1.4 specs I think the copies from the parent  
config would always be used.

I suspect I'm not understanding what you are proposing :-)

thanks
david jencks

>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________
> Want to start your own business?
> Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index