So, can we nuke all_changes.log and branches/dead-1.2 now?

--jason


On Nov 28, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:

> Kevan,
>
> I have looked at all the files modified in the revision 389206.   
> All the functionality from that revision is intact in trunk and  
> branches\1.2.  That revision is no longer relevant and  
> all_changes.log can now be removed.
>
> --vamsi
>
> On 11/28/06, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2006, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
> > Is anyone gonna look at this?
> >
> > I'd really like to nuke this branch and the all_changes.log (and
> > pending-merge-log.sh).
> >
> > Lets not go another week with this unresolved... plz.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
> >
> >> I went thru all_changes.log and for each remaining item marked "Not
> >> Merged" I verified that it is either already in trunk or is
> >> unnecessary.  I marked r389206 as merged because I think all the
> >> parts
> >> that trunk needs are there but if someone has a min could you  
> please
> >> double check it?
>
> Vamsi,
> Looks like you recently hit a lot of the files that 389206 updated.
> Perhaps you could have a look to verify everything looks good?
>
> --kevan
>