geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Testsuite ready for action !
Date Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:32:25 GMT

On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> I haven't seriously tried the new test jars after your added the
> getName(). It failed once but I didn't give it a serious thought since
> I could have been running 2.2-SNAPSHOT. I realized much later that
> there is now a 2.3-SNAPSHOT.

I put it in both 2.2 and 2.3 and published new jars of each.

> Thanks for putting this in. I shall give it a shot soon.

Cool.  Let me know if there's more I can do.

-David

> Cheers
> Prasad.
>
> On 11/29/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2006, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Nov 27, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 11/27/06, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> This looks like a problem with surefire.  These test classes run
>> >>> fine
>> >>> in the released version of surefire, but looks like something  
>> broke
>> >>> in the snapshot version you're using.  It's trying to call  
>> getName()
>> >>> on instances of junit.framework.Test and that interface does not
>> >>> have
>> >>> getName().  Seems they've decided to code in the assumption  
>> that all
>> >>> tests are subclasses of the TestCase abstract class.  They  
>> need to
>> >>> unbreak surefire.
>> >>>
>> >
>> > I added a getName() method and published new binaries.  It may help
>> > you get farther.
>> >
>>
>> Prasad, you getting any farther on this?  Did the added getName()
>> method do the trick?
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message