geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-2607) GoperationInfo should include the return type for the operation
Date Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:22:21 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607?page=all ]

Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2607:
-----------------------------------------

    Attachment: kernel.diff

   I am attaching a patch for initial feedback. Are there any objections to this kind of modification?
The changes are working. In addtion to this the tests need to be fixed to not use the old
classes. Is there a better way of accomplishing the same?

> GoperationInfo should include the return type for the operation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-2607
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2607
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: kernel
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
>         Assigned To: Anita Kulshreshtha
>         Attachments: kernel.diff
>
>
> When the operations are viewed by jconsole the return type is not avaialble. GOpeartionInfo
should keep the retrunType information.
> This will break backward compatibility of GBeanInfo. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message