Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8891 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 18:47:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 18:47:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 96613 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 18:47:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96580 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 18:47:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 96565 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 18:47:22 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:47:22 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=jason.dillon@gmail.com; domainkeys=good X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 Received: from [64.233.162.200] ([64.233.162.200:60452] helo=nz-out-0102.google.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 14/68-08153-730B2254 for ; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:47:20 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id v1so756469nzb for ; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:47:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=KDkiCguP0fNyHn5Qk0VGxc61tdYknwTw0M6vmmxXaUBJvF891sp5pzxgmW9KEKSX68zL4x6rlfZZjvrxoI5A+Zs6qFONGmZh/OPZf7byYZCLvF/j1TI1HOAB1FkDDIE0cfkx5i3RnYrm6xlfvS7LGAIed2EwbI4nNkPkpSck5P8= Received: by 10.65.237.15 with SMTP id o15mr9617503qbr; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.3? ( [24.7.69.241]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e15sm7745720qbe.2006.10.03.11.47.13; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: <77D3BF90-B687-4DD8-A7EF-260828356870@planet57.com> <8DF9A0D8-2D78-4D01-A6BD-ACA30F0E11F4@yahoo.com> <85A23AE0-3774-4E6E-BF5F-F874729627E4@visi.com> <31E2FE0D-78C9-4D43-AB4F-9F6888A18D6A@visi.com> <4372C3D8-8FA3-41BD-8A09-D2416A088858@visi.com> <55846A9F-3E32-4E4A-B94C-B395D7139F1B@planet57.com> <9EB55A98-E891-4BFE-85BA-396BF4209953@visi.com> <735F6E75-2094-4E42-9A80-D9967DDDC291@planet57.com> <5F5AA1C0-9A0B-4AED-85C6-5381B5EC55E5@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: One version for specs Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:47:11 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: Jason Dillon X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:39 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Ok, now it's me whose not reading emails :) You mentioned the site > changes. Is that it? Are we really talking about re-releasing > completely stable specs because of website changes? This was a reason why the spec module might change, not why (or why not) it should be released. --jason