Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender;
        b=ejaq3Wp8gVOB1Lt8RbGEaE1/jJADVJvvDNZOJrSSsrNNC9RxdyahX0KkGZo5apqoxjofriEmwDPax9ZDl+R3TuhUIF5LAfEqJdUcQZzvxoXoZlB1YzuYUUcGSjou6x3IdNvRaMqg32ZqheyVWCFVLNc/o5Db8cQoqRmIcVWUdI4=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <CD57DEB8-3C6A-44ED-A3D6-5B6DF7F3FCED@hogstrom.org>
References: <4DAED20C-1722-4EFC-9F6A-BAEB6205C41D@planet57.com>
 <1A6BA31D-8335-4EAA-AC61-43BB6B157822@optusnet.com.au>
 <231370DE-DD4B-4FC5-BFDF-9A034FA58B8E@planet57.com>
 <CD57DEB8-3C6A-44ED-A3D6-5B6DF7F3FCED@hogstrom.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <6978EB58-B022-4575-AB8F-073588CC1C2F@planet57.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
Subject: Re: Can we male SQLQueryBuilder less verbose?
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 14:24:07 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sender: Jason Dillon <jason.dillon@gmail.com>

Where were the m2 tranql artifacts published too?  I only see one  
artifact in http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/tranql/ (and  
the Parent pom)... where is the rest of it?

I'd still like to update G to use the m2 artifacts.... and if we are  
going to release this puppy soonish we are gonna need some non- 
SNAPSHOT artifacts for tranql.

Any idea what's going on with the restructure and m2 work for tranql?

--jason


On Sep 15, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Looks Gianny applied some changes to the 1.4 version of tranql in  
> trunk.
>
> I just pushed an updated SNAPSHOT out to the Codehaus repo.
>
> Let me know if there is an issue.
>
> On Sep 15, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Were you able to push a release out?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
>>
>>> The log level is now debug. I now need to investigate how to  
>>> deploy the artifact (I have not done that since the "new" CodeHaus).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gianny
>>>
>>> On 13/09/2006, at 5:53 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> These types of logs don't look like they should be at INFO:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>> [INFO] 00:32:52,489 INFO  [SQLQueryBuilder] CMP [Entity logical  
>>>> name=[SimpleCMPEntity]; physical name=[SimpleCMP]] - [Finder  
>>>> method=[findByPrimaryKey]; EJB-QL=[null]] compiled to  
>>>> [JDBCQueryCommand sql=[SELECT S.id FROM SimpleCMP S WHERE S.id  
>>>> = ?]]
>>>> </snip>
>>>>
>>>> Can we make these DEBUG instead?
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> matt@hogstrom.org
>
>
>