Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of paulmcmahan@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=DBgqw3efXPBtkg6vCLlisOYYZ2gMxjE1dXXecAorRecoYw7TSRgpjfoKk+VISgWLr/YXvUDoHGQJHSo96RDMbizCs3IiJLW/4DKw8Sxu6bJ51c4VBBWMVMhUduvLvyejtot90LPBFhy1afaUxjUtzoddtmD2v0TJAXzf2rk/lRM=
Message-ID: <21df75940610190817p7690493w5efebe127c6fb384@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:17:49 -0400
From: "Paul McMahan" <paulmcmahan@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSTL 1.2 for JEE 5
In-Reply-To: <45368669.3010702@earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <45368669.3010702@earthlink.net>

Does anyone know of an alternative to Glassfish's JSTL 1.2?  Also, I
wonder if Jakarta might consider providing an implementation if we
expressed interest in using it in Geronimo?

Paul

On 10/18/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I'm looking at what it would take to include an implementation of JSTL
> 1.2 (JSR 52) for compliance with JEE 5 in Geronimo.  We currently
> include the Jakarta implementation of the 1.1 spec in some of our web
> applications (such as the web console) but not directly in the Geronimo
> J2EE server.
>
> I think the first order of business is to see if I can pick up an open
> source implementation and spec from someplace.  I asked on the Jakarta
> taglibs user mailing list and was told that there is not an effort
> underway to implement the 1.2 version of this spec.  They then pointed
> me to Glassfish.
>
> So, I'm planning to investigate what it would take to include the
> Glassfish implementation into Geronimo.  If any body has any
> concerns/objections/recommendations/insight/etc...  please speak up.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>