Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-39720-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86832 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2006 11:48:22 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2006 11:48:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 16747 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2006 11:48:15 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16694 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2006 11:48:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16683 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2006 11:48:15 -0000
Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org)
 (140.211.166.84)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 04:48:15 -0700
Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=eljotpl@gmail.com;
 domainkeys=good
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
DomainKey-Status: good
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing
 draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
Received: from [64.233.166.180] ([64.233.166.180:3376]
 helo=py-out-1112.google.com)
	by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP
	id 62/57-18133-B7246254 for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>;
 Fri, 06 Oct 2006 04:48:11 -0700
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x66so1047826pye
        for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 04:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=sSdVDr1Ip3zl8miPpaaAD34G73tXJJnLiBAFIRU21JKTf/txRZ+kSiyS91irpEfB/yRtgxjLLFF2u+2AS8GoUs5flbgpgM5+O2m2hvKorc+lxoYhSD3Cg4nDmt+2SSlU2hk2T07ugdCFLCRN5QdYvCdgI59i77PTnGFJhDci9dg=
Received: by 10.35.53.18 with SMTP id f18mr5763538pyk;
        Fri, 06 Oct 2006 04:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.48.10 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 04:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50610060448p1c0a4395g22251ea6f899a3f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:48:08 +0200
From: "Jacek Laskowski" <jacek@laskowski.net.pl>
Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl
Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Remarks on quoting style in emails (was: Re: JMX Viewer)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 82fcfe87ca9c13f4
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 10/6/06, Christopher M. Cardona <chris.m.cardona@gmail.com> wrote:
> See inline comments...
>
> anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> > Comments inline..

I've been following this type of quoting for a while and think it's
time to change (improve?) it a little. I've seen that Anita has been
doing it too, but let me take your email as an example. I'd like to
hear everybody's opinion on them before changing anything, though,
since *I* might be completely wrong.

Here are my comments:

1/ "Comments inline" are unnecessary. We all know that we send emails
to be involved in a converstation. We'll look them up.

> >
> > --- "Christopher M. Cardona" <chris.m.cardona@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>> 1. Is it possible to display 'Geronimo MBeans' (console.doc) sorted
> >>> according to the configurations they belong to?
> >>>
> > <snip>...............

2/ Some emails need formatting before responding. Remove unnecessary
empty lines as they don't bring any value and complicate reading.

> >> One thing we can do is
> >> to
> >> add a list of ServiceModules and clicking each node will list its
> >> MBeans
> >> which is almost close to what you want.
> >>
> >
> >    This would be nice to have.
> >
> >
> OK. I already created a JIRA for this -
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2448.
> >>> 2. Is it possible to view tomcat MBeans?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yes. Currently there are two ways to do this the fastest. One option
> >> is
> >> to navigate the tree - Geronimo MBeans > GBean. Another option is to
> >> do
> >> an MBean search using a pattern like: "geronimo:j2eeType=GBean,*".
> >> Both
> >> will give a list of all the GBeans which include the Tomcat MBeans.
> >>
> >
> >    This only gives only the MBeans that have been exposed via GBeans. A
> > typical tomcat MBean has a name attribute like:
> > Name: Geronimo:type=Connector, port=8443, address=%2F0.0.0.0

3/ Do not quote too much - only relevant part of a message. The rest
is in the original message and everybody can read it in the archives
(unless it's not in one's mailbox already)

If you think they're valid points please use them. Else comment on
them so I'll change my habits and expectations.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl