Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15476 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2006 15:39:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2006 15:39:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 92623 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2006 15:39:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 92568 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2006 15:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 92553 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2006 15:39:54 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:39:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.229 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.229] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.229) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:39:51 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t15so665683wxc for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:39:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=ob++GRT4Z59AXEmL0b6lactZToOKd0wEAE8aq87QoUsXZwANNpGe18oEgObagVBWZEJtvRH95ESvSyrQ18xQfrWJn2sZgvCUA8wTbnxvzBSEZceFg8KeN2qQD2qjXRgGZSMldl4OuwiY0weFa4M1YhmfkutSHL2JCKQA4vtUmR0= Received: by 10.90.71.12 with SMTP id t12mr80905aga; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.27.40.182? ( [129.33.49.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9sm1958517wra.2006.10.19.08.39.29; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <45369D46.2050306@earthlink.net> References: <45369CCB.6090700@pobox.com> <45369D46.2050306@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0AD8345D-6861-40A0-8EA1-A2B1E66A8148@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kevan Miller Subject: Re: Download page incorrectly lists "OS X" and "Unix" as being compatible Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:39:28 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Oct 18, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> They aren't tested. >> Can we put a separate section (or a separate page) for the non- >> certified downloads? >> geir > > IIUC you are concerned about the heading "J2EE 1.4 Certified > Releases" followed by "Linux/Mac OS X/Unix Downloads". Those > downloads are for those various platforms listed even if we only > certified against a subset of the list. Would it be better to just > remove the word "certified" from the earlier heading? > > If necessary, we could specify somewhere else on the download page > that we actually only certified against Linux and Windows. > > What do you think? The web page seems OK to me, as is. The *releases* are certified. We create different distributions to aid users in installing on different platforms. They all contain the same binaries... If you want to remove the "certified", I'm ok with that. If we want to add explicit information about what platforms we certify on (Linux and Azul at the moment), we can do that, also... --kevan