geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JSTL 1.2 for JEE 5
Date Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:10:35 GMT
Here's another option. Depending on how much the spec has changed
between 1.1 and 1.2, we could fork jakarta and provide our own
implementation. Just a thought.

Then again, what are the pros and cons of picking up Glassfish ?

Cheers
Prasad

On 10/19/06, Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know of an alternative to Glassfish's JSTL 1.2?  Also, I
> wonder if Jakarta might consider providing an implementation if we
> expressed interest in using it in Geronimo?
>
> Paul
>
> On 10/18/06, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > I'm looking at what it would take to include an implementation of JSTL
> > 1.2 (JSR 52) for compliance with JEE 5 in Geronimo.  We currently
> > include the Jakarta implementation of the 1.1 spec in some of our web
> > applications (such as the web console) but not directly in the Geronimo
> > J2EE server.
> >
> > I think the first order of business is to see if I can pick up an open
> > source implementation and spec from someplace.  I asked on the Jakarta
> > taglibs user mailing list and was told that there is not an effort
> > underway to implement the 1.2 version of this spec.  They then pointed
> > me to Glassfish.
> >
> > So, I'm planning to investigate what it would take to include the
> > Glassfish implementation into Geronimo.  If any body has any
> > concerns/objections/recommendations/insight/etc...  please speak up.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
> >
>

Mime
View raw message