geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Why are we not using xmlbeans for attributes.xsd processing?
Date Sat, 07 Oct 2006 22:53:15 GMT
Granted 2m seems a bit hefty though...

--jason


On Oct 7, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> Well for starters, there's neither an attributes.xml nor an
> attributes.xsd...  :)
>
> But the answers I think are that when we first did it it was pretty
> simple and XMLBeans seemed kind of heavyweight, and there was an
> ongoing debate about whether we'd actually want to stick with XMLBeans
> for the other stuff anyway.  Also, config.xml has to be loaded
> super-early in the boot process and I'm not sure that XMLBeans is that
> high in the class loader hierarchy presently.  Since it's a couple of
> MB it might be nice if it wasn't strictly required in order to run
> anything at all.
>
> Thanks,
>      Aaron
>
> On 10/7/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Anyone know why we are not using xmlbeans to handle attributes.xml
>> processing (config.xml) ?
>>
>> --jason
>>


Mime
View raw message