geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-2482) Remove console JARs from WEB-INF/lib
Date Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:07:04 GMT

On Oct 11, 2006, at 2:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> I'm just warning that unless those issues are actually fixed in  
> that version that there is going to be a bunch of work needed to  
> properly sort out jira when it comes release time.

I would think that when we are considering whether it's time for a  
release a report of issues marked to be fixed in a particular version  
yet still open would be pretty useful.  I thought we had these for  
just about all previous releases.  Certainly previous release  
managers have reset all open issues marked for a particular release  
to the next version when no one volunteered to fix them.

thanks
david jencks



>
> --jason
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> Isn't the point of a road map to show what's coming / targeted for
>> each release?  Otherwise, it's release notes, not a road map.  I feel
>> pretty strongly that we should have some way for Jira to present a
>> list of the issues targeted to be included in each release.  Do you
>> have an alternative to the road map to suggest?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>      Aaron
>>
>> On 10/10/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>> Its not about what version you believe it should be fixed in...  
>>> fixed
>>> versions is for what version it was actually fixed in.  This  
>>> value is
>>> used to generate the change log in the roadmap and if the issue is
>>> not actually fixed in that version it just pollutes the details that
>>> jira shows us.
>>>
>>> For example, if this issue is not actually fixed in 1.1.2, but
>>> instead fixed in 1.1.3, then there is some confusion when inspecting
>>> the roadmap for what was fixed where.
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>>
>>> > How else can we track what versions we believe it should be  
>>> fixed in?
>>> > I don't know how else I'd find issues to fix in 1.1.2 out of  
>>> the 500+
>>> > open issues.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >     Aaorn
>>> >
>>> > On 10/10/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>> >> Its not a good idea to set the fix for version when creating an
>>> >> issue.  This should be set when closing the issue.
>>> >>
>>> >> --jason
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Aaron Mulder (JIRA) wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Remove console JARs from WEB-INF/lib
>>> >> > ------------------------------------
>>> >> >
>>> >> >                  Key: GERONIMO-2482
>>> >> >                  URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>>> >> > GERONIMO-2482
>>> >> >              Project: Geronimo
>>> >> >           Issue Type: Bug
>>> >> >       Security Level: public (Regular issues)
>>> >> >           Components: console
>>> >> >     Affects Versions: 1.1.1
>>> >> >             Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>>> >> >              Fix For: 1.1.2, 1.2
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > It's unnecessarily hard to build console extension plugins  
>>> because
>>> >> > the car-maven-plugin can't access JARs in a WEB-INF/lib  
>>> directory.
>>> >> > The console web apps should not package any JARs, but  
>>> instead use
>>> >> > dependency elements to add them to the class path.  (e.g.  
>>> console-
>>> >> > framework packages castor)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> >> > -
>>> >> > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>>> >> > administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
>>> >> > Administrators.jspa
>>> >> > -
>>> >> > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/
>>> >> > software/jira
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>


Mime
View raw message