geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Spec versioning
Date Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:04:32 GMT
The original proposal isn't on the summary yet.  I'm going to spend  
some time while at ApacheCon working on a more accurate summary of  
the options which will hopefully give us all a bit of time from this  
heated discussion to relax.

-dain

On Oct 7, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

> There are pros and cons for all solutions afaik.
> So let's just vote on the possible options.
>
> On 10/7/06, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Since there seems to be significant objection to one version or
>> specs... lets just go back to the original plan we had started to
>> vote on, which is similar to the model used to release m2 plugins.
>> It is not as simple as one version, but whatever... we need to get
>> this fixed.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Oct 4, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>
>> > I'd like to reach conclusion on the spec versioning policy this
>> > week, so I spent an hour attempting to fairly summarize the two
>> > main spec versioning proposals: one version and version per spec.
>> > My summary can be found here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
>> > display/GMOxDEV/Spec+Versioning
>> >
>> > I propose that we spend a day updating the summary of the options
>> > and possibly adding more proposals (like David's proposal), and
>> > tomorrow we vote on which procedure to choose for the specs.
>> > Please, do not sandbag a proposal you are against or unfairly pump
>> > up the one you are for as this will only delay this decision.
>> >
>> > Please participate early, so we can get this bikeshed behind us,
>> >
>> > -dain
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet


Mime
View raw message