Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=rmYWFqGnaKITWS0wFQae3lERQDUDNAg7iwvYLibnf/NYgntfaiT5s0cTSvfZ2a0VmDpd0I1vLfjsZsEYbo9CmAGIppMrQxV4tNGKJyut0JyeeZN2eNopQ9ul4RM0NmG3dekYGBAiRJv49KTD0s5kYAfmeuxbXnz8YQPxRAwVyrk=
Message-ID: <dc6c89840609191255k2b191602kcc9f8b96caab2e4d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:55:20 -0700
From: "Dain Sundstrom" <dsundstrom@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Re: Dojo Toolkit inclusion to Geronimo
In-Reply-To: <21df75940609191025h6e591bf8p808f01b23782118b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <450763E0.9070202@gmail.com>
	 <19e0530f0609121853o77ff6cd1ia1e17260dcb01852@mail.gmail.com>
	 <45076812.4000507@gmail.com>
	 <9F6BEE5F-6D5B-4669-B0E6-F07087961157@optusnet.com.au>
	 <21df75940609130840w35d6ec73m88103d6c6d3bb3b9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <21df75940609191025h6e591bf8p808f01b23782118b@mail.gmail.com>

BTW how big are the DOJO files?

-dain

On 9/19/06, Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK based on discussion here on the dev list and in GERONIMO-2333 I
> just committed the code for GERONIMO-2406 into trunk rev 447903.  This
> introduces the Dojo files as a new webapp into the server and creates
> a dependency from the console onto this app so that Chris can
> reference it from the JMX Debug portlet at /dojo instead of checking
> in a private copy for the console.  When an application is deployed
> into Geronimo and the console is already deployed it can use the
> shared copy.  Otherwise it can install the Dojo webapp as a plugin --
> AFAIK all the files are in place to generate the plugin I just have to
> make sure that it gets out to a plugin repository, etc.
>
> I will add a wiki page to describe all this.
>
> This is my first commit while Geronimo has just gone back to CTR so I
> hope I have not botched something up.  If I made any rookie mistakes
> then please be gentle and I promise to fix it :-)
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On 9/13/06, Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Gianny,  I agree that the JMX Viewer portlet Chris has contributed is
> > fantastic and more people should take a look at it!  I also agree that
> > we should think about how the Dojo files are checked in -- directly in
> > the console vs. as a separate module.  I was thinking about creating a
> > separate web app containing the Dojo files that could be shared across
> > all web apps in Geronimo and managed separately from them.  The thread
> > Chris referenced above discusses the idea in more detail:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg29777.html
> >
> > Maybe the time is right to move forward on that idea (or some variant)
> > and let the JMX viewer portlet be the first exploiter.  Or if Chris'
> > current implementation is integrated as-is then we discussed
> > retrofitting it to work this way later -- see the comments in
> > GERONIMO-2333.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
> > On 9/13/06, Gianny Damour <gianny.damour@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > The JMX Viewer portlet is finally working for me. Actually, it seems
> > > that due to a Dojo known issue, this portlet does not work with
> > > Safari :(; having said that, it works really nicely, and I really
> > > mean really nicely, with IE.
> > >
> > > Regarding your patch, I believe that this is a large piece of work;
> > > unfortunately, I cannot appreciate it as this is the first time that
> > > I am seeing dojo in action. Also, I think that instead of checking in
> > > the dojo files directly at the right location, we should check in a
> > > tar.ball of these files and expand it upon build of the module. I
> > > think that this is better because this way we do know which files are
> > > dojo specifics (this is a minor detail). What do you think?
> > >
> > > It would be cool if other people could have a look to this patch; for
> > > sure, it really deserves it!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gianny
> > >
> >
>