Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain yahoo.com from
 66.94.25.112 cause and error)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
In-Reply-To: <1C20C30A-EEA2-4B41-AE8A-459D95B7C623@hogstrom.org>
References: <57143ED4-25BC-47EC-9497-C301A6E1F0B6@hogstrom.org>
 <1C20C30A-EEA2-4B41-AE8A-459D95B7C623@hogstrom.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <A41D5DF6-E1ED-4575-86BB-AC51251E38F0@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE SUMMARY] 1.1.1-rc3
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:50:08 -0400
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

Sorry to be a pain, but I thought we had to vote on the actual  
artifact we plan to release, not something similar to the artifact we  
plan to release.

So, IMO we may have voted to release something called 1.1.1-rc3, with  
lots of 1.1.1-rc3 versioned jars inside it.  I don't think we can  
release something called 1.1.1 with 1.1.1 versioned jars in it  
without an additional vote.

I'm +1 on rebuilding with the actual version number without code  
changes, but I think we need to vote on the result yet again.

BTW I find a problem creating a datasource through the console for a  
xa datasource -- I fixed a similar problem in trunk recently, but  
don't think this needs to block the release.

Am I on crack?

thanks
david jencks

On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Voting has concluded.  There were 7 +1 votes and a comment by Paul  
> that has been researched and addressed.
>
> I will release 1.1.1 later today.
>
> Thanks to everyone who worked on this monster :)