Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67469 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2006 09:07:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Sep 2006 09:07:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 32143 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2006 09:07:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32109 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2006 09:07:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32098 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2006 09:07:35 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:07:35 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=jason.dillon@gmail.com; domainkeys=good X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 Received: from [64.233.182.189] ([64.233.182.189:5300] helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 70/FC-05478-0D09B154 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:07:28 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so694509nfc for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:07:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:sender; b=YkkC7IWcz9LhR/M6pAsvOQocwlTSYyp3p4ZeNeEkYGcALEttTizkWVEJnNpIkNvRZgF2QRXnd8/DnO/+sr9q3zpc5WBlWgV2WYuJNd9s7T5VzkYBamjrhH/iXUDqZ/kng1hXVF1lLuUhkgzOnypkJhi488n7Y2kRwLCjHl9kQz4= Received: by 10.78.201.15 with SMTP id y15mr1219907huf; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.3? ( [24.7.69.241]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 38sm859939hua.2006.09.28.02.07.18; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: <451B1A11.4080808@mchsi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Dillon Subject: Re: Geronimo Architecture Documentation Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:07:10 -0700 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: Jason Dillon X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Um... TeX or Docbook is probably much more "universal" in the open source world than any bloated, expensive and buggy microsoft unstableware. And, while I think architecture docs are great... they tend to become outdated very quickly, especially as we keep changing the internals of the server. --jason On Sep 27, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Well...Word format and Powerpoint as root formats is probably the > most universal (Matt ducks anticipating a wave of anti-microsoft > tomatoes) that are ultimately available as PDFs from the project. > OpenOffice sounds nice but in my experience its not very good and > less portable. > > On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Ryan Senior wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to write some in-depth architecture documentation for >> Geronimo. I'm thinking it might be a little large for the wiki >> (maybe 20 pages or more???). Is there a preferred documentation >> format? Maybe docbook? >> >> Is there a particular part of the architecture that I should make >> sure to write about/focus on? I was thinking that the interaction >> of the various GBeans would be a good place to start. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Ryan >> >> > > Matt Hogstrom > matt@hogstrom.org > > >