Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=PJ1t6Vp9H2PR8+16S0SezbT216ahuIcZO5ByLEmfQr+cY4sChQqbqw6RxZw0Oy4NvLkFclAOuQflp4EHjzRPKDx6JqjHy2W6HVAUjZkZzZ1wvikrkd6AF+Fy8G85wf9afEdypdYQDdF/RfFw5XfS1PHNxZBcDOqlAARyYIymySk=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3)
In-Reply-To: <dc6c89840609191658y731c2f7fs9e33933614499693@mail.gmail.com>
References: <86D5B4BC-5BB7-4C45-B251-61E64196B3BC@iq80.com>
 <356F1C24-7DB8-4985-BD2F-F34388D65AA7@iq80.com>
 <21df75940609071511y136b1ecenaa26953e941fe4ce@mail.gmail.com>
 <1387266644-1157730362-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-386911764-@bxe059-cell01.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
 <29D7575A-62B6-4071-8BEE-6A2F3B6A8C05@iq80.com>
 <dc6c89840609191658y731c2f7fs9e33933614499693@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <58097719-B36C-440C-BEDC-9632A90C1467@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Poll] Next release?
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:07:16 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

Oops, I missed replying.

For me,

1- cert
2- release date
3- feature set
4- name

I could probably be talked out of the release date priority if we are  
producing weekly certifiable builds and our build/tck process is  
working really smoothly.

I'm really really really worried about the amount of development on  
trunk that has not had the tck run against it.

thanks
david jencks

On Sep 19, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> I only got a few responses, but we the results were almost unanimous
> so I'm going to take this as a sign that most people agree with what
> was already posted.  If you do disagree with the poll results, please
> speak up.
>
> RESULTS:
>
> [1] Certification
> [2] Feature Set
> [3] Release Date
> [4] Release Name
>
> Certification is a requirement and timeline will be pushed to achieve
> a desired feature set and no one seems to care what the release are
> named :)
>
>
> Based on this feed back, I will start another thread where we can
> discuss the feature requirements for the next release.  Again if you
> disagree, please jump in now.
>
> Thanks for the feed back,
>
> -dain
>
> On 9/8/06, Dain Sundstrom <dain@iq80.com> wrote:
>> In an attempt to quantify our expectation about the next release from
>> trunk, please rank the following items in importance to you:
>>
>> [ ] Release Date
>> [ ] Feature Set
>> [ ] Release Name
>> [ ] Certification
>>
>>
>>