Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20394 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2006 13:18:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2006 13:18:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 94961 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2006 13:18:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94798 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2006 13:18:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94780 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2006 13:18:33 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 06:18:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.86.89.66] (HELO elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 06:18:32 -0700 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=hPGFHmWqFTU0EmRfxb5oDMoqHvXcCpvWm0oHqFcaTvfUst/6ApCz7T2lyD1Zblg2; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [129.33.49.251] (helo=[9.37.214.149]) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GKxIB-00079b-KE for dev@geronimo.apache.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:18:11 -0400 Message-ID: <44FECA98.2070106@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:18:16 -0400 From: Joe Bohn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Restructuring trunk, then next steps References: <90F6BA89-E7C1-4DBD-8806-67071C2FBB4F@planet57.com> <44FDCF25.9010909@hogstrom.org> <6FCA45AE-812C-44D8-ACB4-985D4DFEE304@planet57.com> <0B66DE5D-07F0-4073-8958-48E035A10286@iq80.com> <9C3E8101-F70B-4C77-A8FE-7D8CE7EE2D45@planet57.com> <2 <594CFDFC-3DDD-489B-9D27-B59A541E89B2@planet57.com> <44FE722C.4070402@hogstrom.org> In-Reply-To: <44FE722C.4070402@hogstrom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: c408501814fc19611aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7914986eda183c8b6dfa80d89842d1d7ef350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 129.33.49.251 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Matt Hogstrom wrote: > System seems to made up of the core elements of Geronimo. Are we > missing a /distributions or /server element? It would be awesome to > only have to change the version of the distributions in one place. I had recommended we rename /system to /server as I think that most of the elements contained within it are what we typically think of when we think of the server in a more generic sense. ... > Anyway, I think we definitely need a /server which would be the minimal > Geronimo server (w/o a web container that plugins can be installed into) > and a /dist for the J2EE certified server versions. I'm not following why the minimal geronimo server would be pulled out into it's own top level tree (or am I mis-understanding your proposal)? Isn't this just another assembly since I assume we'll still have at least one assembly available that will be the full Geronimo distribution for users that want a full blown server right out of the box? BTW, I've been calling this more minimal assembly "framework" on my local build but I still have it located under /assemblies (ie. assemblies/geronimo-framework) since it's the core framework from a user perspective used to build up a personalized server. Joe