Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3766 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2006 18:25:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2006 18:25:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 77546 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2006 18:25:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77498 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2006 18:25:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77482 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2006 18:25:04 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:25:04 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org smtp.mail=paulmcmahan@gmail.com; spf=pass Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=paulmcmahan@gmail.com; domainkeys=good X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain gmail.com designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 Received: from [66.249.92.174] ([66.249.92.174:7521] helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id D8/62-06791-76A24154 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:24:42 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so322705ugc for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:24:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RhYcI77lI8SgxH9TVuepwVE3RiYdTaJ9hrfPXQYrt3qz+rjKg0I/78Xkjd+y33O25BsTXlfIEl1ib2YV2V4CVnHyRcooNDIdDPCnij/rHh2rwP045zNBZhMgapPCSMxrYSVKjAz6w4i0iWUfC7M+J8xgeoPinvns2JKMN6N2quY= Received: by 10.67.105.19 with SMTP id h19mr824480ugm; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.19.8 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <21df75940609221124x34a6c53el5644bcaee16d7c96@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:24:21 -0400 From: "Paul McMahan" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins? In-Reply-To: <1b5bfeb50609150025t659dd80cm3d76fa1de459ce33@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1b5bfeb50609150025t659dd80cm3d76fa1de459ce33@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 9/15/06, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > I'd like to gather as much suggestions/opinions/advices as possible > before calling a vote. I haven't seen any feedback on this thread since last week but I think it's still an important topic. From what I understand, Jacek has suggested that we create a plugin repository at http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins. I proposed using the maven repo as a plugin repository instead but haven't seen any feedback on that idea so I'm doubting it has support. Other than floating that idea as an alternative (which I'm satisfied has been done) I don't really have any concerns with calling a vote at this time, if that's still the intention. Any others out there have opinions on this matter? Best wishes, Paul