Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 950 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2006 18:08:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 18:08:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 17848 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2006 18:08:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 17724 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2006 18:08:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 17713 invoked by uid 99); 25 Sep 2006 18:08:12 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:08:11 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org smtp.mail=eljotpl@gmail.com; spf=pass Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=eljotpl@gmail.com; domainkeys=good X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.166.178 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 Received: from [64.233.166.178] ([64.233.166.178:32858] helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 15/2E-13750-4FA18154 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:07:50 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x66so3514240pye for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=SDdF/7hEMkcDN5aGdH8KsPnLW4EERGK1H7Niw1xFjRj/MbaBYOkiengn+1kqEq92YduikD6Bqw4ElaScI0/LSnTgsjdTBcTPxkQwlrh9voM3aR/1fk5UrJ7M4xBGZjnh040Pzls5Ryl5SwRRICGN3KFjR+Se+4mhd/GaKnLZPdM= Received: by 10.35.109.2 with SMTP id l2mr8811357pym; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.48.10 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50609251107n46ee6c1dp159612a5e26f4f50@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:07:23 +0200 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Micro-G In-Reply-To: <451808AE.1050607@earthlink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <451808AE.1050607@earthlink.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: dd43ae5cfc52ef9b X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 9/25/06, Joe Bohn wrote: > So far, I've been doing this on my local image. I would like to get > this code (incomplete as it currently is) checked into trunk to better > manage the changes and to share the effort. Is this considered a > "controversial change"? Should I first provide a patch as it currently > stands so that folks can comment on it prior to a commit(ala RTC)? I wonder why you haven't been doing your experiments in a branch or the sandbox? You would surely avoid dealing with these troubles. > Should I go ahead and commit this new assembly and config updates? +0 Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl