Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53942 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2006 15:49:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2006 15:49:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 45746 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 15:49:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 45640 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 15:49:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 45629 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2006 15:49:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.178] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:49:53 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z59so3367148pyg for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mEKWXVWvhZbS9vttPsXbucPuB9MLntXiSTfjUz2eaGawIaNjO0NzgshO6rszpEpU+kLlQet9zLSDlUbzPCSXfFgakUvvU+U+ODmEQ3hWhHSZjd+PpoCI0iFm/SplxcAHEVGIzEKlYagj6skY7gKgrVgFz3q6Rz+9KEtLYv/BH2Y= Received: by 10.35.82.4 with SMTP id j4mr17491280pyl; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.48.10 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50609150838q5bfd236dl45535df0e98094b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:38:30 +0200 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins? In-Reply-To: <21df75940609150820q591ef17ex70edf65f9dfce0cc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1b5bfeb50609150025t659dd80cm3d76fa1de459ce33@mail.gmail.com> <21df75940609150820q591ef17ex70edf65f9dfce0cc@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f04db6c3a1c4040c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 9/15/06, Paul McMahan wrote: > Jacek, I see a couple of discussions going on in parallel: Well, I should've seen them too, and I did in fact, but completely forgot about them. Perhaps, it's time to start doing after everything's said ;-) > geronimoplugincentral.org -- this is is a plugin user community site > inspired by eclipseplugincentral.com that was announced to the dev > list a few weeks ago. Where the thread left off was that there were > suggestions to host the site at http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins > instead of a private domain. I proposed a plan of action to make that > happen in the thread "plugin community site" and am ready for > feedback, assuming that +1's would equal support. Do we need a full-blown web site (with Joomla behind)? Wouldn't a maven-like structure be enough? Just to see how it goes and bring the jpa plugin here (where its home is ;-)) > geronimo plugins subproject -- IIUC this proposed subproject is for > plugin developers and would be similar to the Geronimo plugins project > at sourceforge but hosted at ASF and governed by Geronimo (like > devtools). Several folks have volunteered to help and I would also > like to take this opportunity to volunteer to help. There's a thread > "maven repository hosting geronimo plugins" that proposes using the > maven repository for hosting the plugins generated by ASF instead of > creating a new infrastructure for hosting plugins. No feedback on that > idea yet. That's why I asked about it again. Everybody's busy so only the hottest features are able to survive, and the others need to be pushed a little ;-) > I see these two discussions as separate because they address two > different communities -- plugin users vs. plugin developers. But I > wonder if you view them as the same since you allude to an official > plugins subproject hosted at http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins ? I don't know if they need to have their own repo. Just thinking out loud and thinking we could separate them in a 'plugins' subdirectory of the Geronimo repo pretty well, too. If they get large they could become a subproject or a tlp project, whatever. I think we need to make a home for them before people will scratch their heads where they could be developed. What I'm leaning toward is a very unideal yet working solution with http://geronimo.apache.org/plugins and plugins subdirectory in place. If/when we decide something better we'll change it. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl