Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57680 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2006 10:48:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2006 10:48:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 55092 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2006 10:48:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 55051 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2006 10:48:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 55040 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2006 10:48:21 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 03:48:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of eljotpl@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.180] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 03:48:21 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x66so6970389pye for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 03:48:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=oHt3UaJdDLWcUa3iufA4hs1UVEKiEoK++KYGDL7AFDV8LdSSp4MbtSX+kSM7jzyX4UEyVQZC6TEXh+95UQ1aBAM/3mmZyqCWi9mxctFRWaLbwnqd13drDXVGSd4TLR6QMvyC4BC5hVUZc0TJxPzofpzCPO0I+Yq8GOM7G7PI3Lw= Received: by 10.35.108.12 with SMTP id k12mr14484482pym; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 03:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.48.10 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 03:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b5bfeb50609060348o695e8dccg84f304a3541e77dd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:48:00 +0200 From: "Jacek Laskowski" Reply-To: jacek@laskowski.net.pl Sender: eljotpl@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: Returning to Commit-Then-Review? In-Reply-To: <937046e80609051809u717efb50u76a590d6e31bae30@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EB8CF2.8080205@Golux.Com> <862FE1D9-DECA-4E8D-9FEB-A1ACEBBE634D@visi.com> <937046e80609051809u717efb50u76a590d6e31bae30@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: d9db7d3d13c95f97 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 9/6/06, Jason Dillon wrote: > I will support anything that does not leave patches to fester and > still provides any required pre-commit oversight. > > I would really like to see a CTR-like policy that puts trust back into > the community for example, I trust Hirams activemq patch but my > concurrent patch... well I want others to ack it first, as it his > areas of the server which are not as familiar to me. > > It seems to me that David's proposal fits into this... > > Can we please make an effort to agree on a policy? And once agreed > upon, have the PMC officially announce it? > > I believe this is critical for our community to move forward. Thanks Jason for bringing it up. I started a page http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=23530 to let us know where we are. Nothing there yet, but let us^H^Hme get started. Will copy emails from Dave and others there. It's accessible from http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Documentation, but it doesn't look good. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl