geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hiram Chirino" <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Restructuring trunk, then next steps
Date Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:42:53 GMT
On 9/7/06, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2006, at 7:28 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
> > BTW I do think we should rename the dirs to match the maven
> > standard geronimo-foo standard.
>
> I completely agree
> >
> > -dain
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> Fine with me.
> >>
> >> The tree is still in need of reorganization even after those
> >> modules are gone.
> >>
> >> --jason
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please don't get mad at me, but I'd like to move a bit slower on
> >>> more classification inside of the server module.  I'd like to
> >>> pull transaction and connector out to independently versioned
> >>> modules and then see if the tree still feels crowded.
>
> I tend to agree with this too.  One think I have thought briefly
> about for years (?!) is separating the builder modules and the
> runtime modules.
>

+1!

> thanks
> david jencks
> <big snip>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Mime
View raw message