geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Development Process
Date Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:08:16 GMT

On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:

> Sorry if I wasn't clear.  My vote is for 3 without qualifications.   
> Was simply adding (unsuccessfully) that my proposal didn't make it  
> into the list of options.

I didn't mean to come across too strongly.  I was noticing on this  
vote and others that people are +1 ing with comments.  So far its not  
an issue but I think this leaves room for confusion later on.  Thanks

Matt Hogstrom

View raw message