geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2399) Support both jetty 5 and jetty 6
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:01:13 GMT
Ugh... I hope not.

I forget why we needed yoko and non-yoko versions, but if we can  
avoid needing more assemblies we should aim for that.

--jason


On Sep 13, 2006, at 1:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> Jason Dillon (JIRA) wrote:
>>     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2399? 
>> page=comments#action_12434328 ]             Jason Dillon commented  
>> on GERONIMO-2399:
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>> Does that mean we have 2x more assemblies too?  (hope not)
>>
> Me too, since I've already seen it proposed that we'd need yoko and  
> non-yoko versions of the assemblies too (at least the full j2ee  
> versions).
>
>>
>>> Support both jetty 5 and jetty 6
>>> --------------------------------
>>>
>>>                 Key: GERONIMO-2399
>>>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ 
>>> GERONIMO-2399
>>>             Project: Geronimo
>>>          Issue Type: New Feature
>>>      Security Level: public(Regular issues)          Components:  
>>> Jetty
>>>    Affects Versions: 1.2
>>>            Reporter: David Jencks
>>>             Fix For: 1.2
>>>
>>>
>>> For a while I think we're going to want to support both jetty 5  
>>> and jetty 6.  In order to support this I suggest we rename trunk  
>>> geronimo-jetty and geronimo-jetty-builder to geronimo-jetty5 and  
>>> geronimo-jetty5-builder and similarly for the configs and rename  
>>> the similar modules in sandbox/servlet2.5 geronimo-jetty6 and  
>>> geronimo-jetty6-builder.  I would like to get the proposed  
>>> geronimo-jetty6* modules into trunk as soon as possible: I  
>>> suggest the default profile does not build them but we have an  
>>> additional profile that does.
>>> I realize there are issues with jee5 schema support that will  
>>> require additional work to resolve: I'm planning to look into  
>>> this.  Jan has obviously made a big start in the servlet2.5 branch.
>>>
>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message