geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: When has the server started?
Date Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:06:33 GMT

On Sep 4, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:39 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>> IMO this would be a perversion of the geronimo architecture.  What  
>> does "fully started" mean anyway?  If you start with say geronimo- 
>> jetty-minimal and add cars to turn it into a full j2ee server  
>> while it is running, when exactly is it started?  It certainly has  
>> nothing to do with the kernel.
>>
>> When we thought about this last the best idea we could come up  
>> with is that it's "fully started" when all the modules listed in  
>> persistent configuration lists (should be persistent module lists)  
>> that are in the bootstrap or included recursively in those modules  
>> are started. Think about what happens if a module in the original  
>> PCL includes another PCL.
>
> Started (or fully started) means that the server has loaded,  
> initialized and started all modules in the persistent  
> configuration, such that it could then start to serve  
> applications... and start listening on ports, etc.  True there  
> might be more modules to be loaded or configured after that, but  
> the point is to tell when the server is ready to start accepting  
> work.  There is a period while the server is starting, when it  
> starts listening to http, but it is not ready to serve applications  
> which have been configured to be deployed.
ya- that's a bug :-(
>
> Anyways, I don't care too much what it is called... but I think  
> that flag should be exposed as a simple Boolean on some common MBean.

That's a great idea!

> Maybe its not the Kernel, as the kernel might be started, but the  
> system might not be ready to serve my webapps or whatever.  Having  
> to pull in geronimo-kernel to perform a simple remote call to fetch  
> a boolean is overkill... especially since that module has magical  
> logging fluff that rudely overwrites configuration.
>
> If we had a specialized MBean/GBean that just exposed the very  
> common remote functionality via JMX directly then we would be in a  
> very good position to keep tools (IDE plugins, maven plugins, etc)  
> working even after we change the internals around.  Such tools need  
> an easy way to:
>
>  * Detect when the server is started and ready to server applications
>  * Shutdown
>
> Probably some other things too...

yup

thanks
david jencks

>
> --jason
>


Mime
View raw message